So the C63 beat the M3 in a R&T comparo...(M)

David Brent · 05-06-2008, 07:43 PM

based on mainly on superior low end power. I wonder who how a Dinaned-out 335 (brakes, suspension, chip, intercooler) would've fared in that test.

I know Dinan is overpriced, etc, etc but you are warrantied so that would be a somewhat fair comparison to stock cars.

Year's_End · 05-06-2008, 07:48 PM

Was a very fair and honest comparo imo. The cars were only separated by a fraction of a point (and each scored approx 196 points to put that in perspective). I'd take a C63 over an M3, but hey, that's just me.

lauer87 · 05-06-2008, 08:26 PM

I'm looking at getting a C63 in the next few days. Having driven both, I can see why both cars were within a point of each other. I was suprised how close the M3 felt acceleration wise to the C63. I didn't think the M3 would pull as hard as it did. The M3 feels more planted cornering, but the C63 is alot closer to it than the C32/55 were to the old E46 M3. The exhaust, seats and new Command/Nav system in the C63 are pretty amazing also.

PaulBailey@ltbmw · 05-06-2008, 08:31 PM

451hp for $54k!

amuzement · 05-06-2008, 08:38 PM

Yeah, I was pretty disappointed when I saw it too. I thought it would be M3 then C63 then isF then rs4. Ive only driven the F out of the four, and it felt amazing.

galahad05 · 05-06-2008, 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xPaulBaiLeyx

451hp for $54k!

...

...

...

Say again?!? $54k!!!???

Must. Resist. Temptation.

Nikos335i · 05-06-2008, 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bimmer Loyalist

Was a very fair and honest comparo imo. The cars were only separated by a fraction of a point (and each scored approx 196 points to put that in perspective). I'd take a C63 over an M3, but hey, that's just me.

If this is how you feel you must change your screen name

!!!

PaulBailey@ltbmw · 05-06-2008, 09:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by axi

Yeah, I was pretty disappointed when I saw it too. I thought it would be M3 then C63 then isF then rs4. Ive only driven the F out of the four, and it felt amazing.

DAMN!!! Those are all suchhhh amazing cars! I wish i could own them all.

Quote:

Originally Posted by galahad05

...

...

...

Say again?!? $54k!!!???

Must. Resist. Temptation.

Geeez i know!!! I was totally thinking the same thing

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nikos335i

If this is how you feel you must change your screen name

!!!

Hahaha

picus · 05-06-2008, 09:25 PM

I prefer the M3 personally, but here in Canada there is, literally, a 15K+ difference in price (you can get a C63 otd for 70k, M3s are all over 85k otd). For that kind of money I'd almost definitely take the C63.

silversurfer · 05-06-2008, 09:49 PM

I'd still take the M3 over the C63

BMW335icDDS · 05-07-2008, 03:04 AM

I'd rather have the C63 than the M3.

05-07-2008, 03:07 AM

C63 is definately faster than an M3 in a straight line. They are both very different cars and have their pros/cons....

Robert · 05-07-2008, 03:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bimmer Loyalist

Was a very fair and honest comparo imo. The cars were only separated by a fraction of a point (and each scored approx 196 points to put that in perspective). I'd take a C63 over an M3, but hey, that's just me.

What kind of bimmer loyalist are you?

That said, I'd probably get a C63 as well. The car will be plenty of fun for city driving. I will just go up to people and say 300 hp is fast, 400 will take your breath away, thats why I have 451hp.

[u2b]<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/5eOLq07VwSE&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/5eOLq07VwSE&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>[/u2b]

Hula-Hula · 05-07-2008, 05:19 AM

^ haha nice quote!

I go back and forth with the c63 and m3... If I'm at BMW's webspecial - BMW wins, if I look at the C63's webspecial it wins etc, etc...

________
Chrysler california cruiser
________
Marijuana Strain Strawberry Cough
________
WEB SHOWS

ArmyBimmerDude · 05-07-2008, 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by galahad05

...

...

...

Say again?!? $54k!!!???

Must. Resist. Temptation.

Base price

6MTFTMFW · 05-07-2008, 09:22 AM

I think everyone is missing the main difference, c63 is automatic ONLY.
That car is dead to me, i wouldn't take it for FREE

If i wanted a fast straight line automatic, I would just get an SRT-8-whatever and for 2 grand a couple of redneck mechanics would make me a 600RWHP rocket.

So, no thanks to c63

stressdoc · 05-07-2008, 09:27 AM

M3. Just wish we could get a CSL that weighed under 3k. Dream on. Or wait for the Z2. But then I would rather drive a Lotus than a tank.

If you want a C63 why not get a 'vette?

BK · 05-07-2008, 10:14 AM

Dammit, am I the only who can't find the link?

ttdmac · 05-07-2008, 10:16 AM

The Stig says the M3 is faster around a track.

Winston Wolf · 05-07-2008, 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ttdmac

The Stig says the M3 is faster around a track.

Some say he once pushed a little old lady down the stairs to the tube in Piccadilly Circus.

flyinb501 · 05-07-2008, 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Winston Wolf

Some say he once pushed a little old lady down the stairs to the tube in Piccadilly Circus.

Hahaha

KL2DC · 05-07-2008, 01:36 PM

I find myself strangely attracted to the C63 as well despite all the published nods to the M3 dynamically and aesthetically and my general dislike/distrust of the 3-pointed star brand.

05-06-2008, 07:43 PM	#1
David Brent Private 9 Rep 65 Posts Drives: e90 335 Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: USA iTrader: (0)	So the C63 beat the M3 in a R&T comparo...(M) based on mainly on superior low end power. I wonder who how a Dinaned-out 335 (brakes, suspension, chip, intercooler) would've fared in that test. I know Dinan is overpriced, etc, etc but you are warrantied so that would be a somewhat fair comparison to stock cars. __________________ 2007 e90 335i \| SGM \| ZSP \| 6MT \| SSTT \| KWV2 2007 e91 328i \| TiAg \| ZSP \| ZPP \| 6AT
	Appreciate 0 Tweet Quote

05-06-2008, 07:48 PM	#2
Year's_End Lieutenant General 1149 Rep 12,445 Posts Drives: 2020 Shelby GT350 Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: FL iTrader: (0)	Was a very fair and honest comparo imo. The cars were only separated by a fraction of a point (and each scored approx 196 points to put that in perspective). I'd take a C63 over an M3, but hey, that's just me. __________________ Past: '08 E92 335i\|ZPP\|ZSP\|6AT Past: '15 Mustang GT\|401A\|PP\|6MT Current: '20 Shelby GT350\|6MT
	Appreciate 0 Quote

05-06-2008, 08:26 PM	#3
lauer87 Lieutenant 8 Rep 586 Posts Drives: 335xi Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: USA iTrader: (0)	I'm looking at getting a C63 in the next few days. Having driven both, I can see why both cars were within a point of each other. I was suprised how close the M3 felt acceleration wise to the C63. I didn't think the M3 would pull as hard as it did. The M3 feels more planted cornering, but the C63 is alot closer to it than the C32/55 were to the old E46 M3. The exhaust, seats and new Command/Nav system in the C63 are pretty amazing also.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

05-06-2008, 08:31 PM	#4
PaulBailey@ltbmw General 665 Rep 26,878 Posts Drives: 2-325 330 2-335 2-Z4 2-135 X5d Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Huntington Beach, CA iTrader: (34) Garage List 2008 BMW 335i E90 [7.00] 2011 BMW 335i E92 [7.96]	451hp for $54k!
	Appreciate 0 Quote

05-06-2008, 08:38 PM	#5
amuzement First Lieutenant 10 Rep 312 Posts Drives: F22 228i M Sport Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Anaheim Hills, CA iTrader: (0)	Yeah, I was pretty disappointed when I saw it too. I thought it would be M3 then C63 then isF then rs4. Ive only driven the F out of the four, and it felt amazing.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

05-06-2008, 09:25 PM	#9
picus Brigadier General 125 Rep 4,172 Posts Drives: e92 SG 335i Coupe Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Toronto, ON iTrader: (0)	I prefer the M3 personally, but here in Canada there is, literally, a 15K+ difference in price (you can get a C63 otd for 70k, M3s are all over 85k otd). For that kind of money I'd almost definitely take the C63.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

05-06-2008, 09:49 PM	#10
silversurfer TiAg, ZPP, ZSP, Nav, CA, 6FL, butt warmer 2 Rep 78 Posts Drives: 2008 335i Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Bay Area, CA iTrader: (0)	M3 vs. C63 on Topgear I'd still take the M3 over the C63
	Appreciate 0 Quote

05-07-2008, 03:04 AM	#11
BMW335icDDS Doctor 32 Rep 634 Posts Drives: RRSport, 335vert, 997 S, Sc430 Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Los Angeles and New York iTrader: (0) Garage List 2007 Porsche 997S [0.00] 2007 Porsche 997S [0.00] 2007 BMW 335 E93 [9.00]	I'd rather have the C63 than the M3. __________________ 2002 Lexus Sc430 2007 BMW 335i Convertible Space Gray on Coral Red 2007 Porsche Carrera S 2011 Range Rover Sport HSE Lux UCLA D.D.S. Columbia University Dental Specialist
	Appreciate 0 Quote

05-07-2008, 03:07 AM	#12
nico335 Guest 0 Rep n/a Posts Drives:	C63 is definately faster than an M3 in a straight line. They are both very different cars and have their pros/cons....
	Appreciate 0 Quote

05-07-2008, 05:19 AM	#14
Hula-Hula Lieutenant Colonel 91 Rep 1,964 Posts Drives: ♥ Join Date: May 2005 Location: Nürburgring iTrader: (0)	^ haha nice quote! I go back and forth with the c63 and m3... If I'm at BMW's webspecial - BMW wins, if I look at the C63's webspecial it wins etc, etc... ________ Chrysler california cruiser ________ Marijuana Strain Strawberry Cough ________ WEB SHOWS Last edited by Hula-Hula; 08-27-2011 at 07:33 AM..
	Appreciate 0 Quote

05-07-2008, 09:22 AM	#16
6MTFTMFW First Lieutenant 84 Rep 392 Posts Drives: 2018 F30 340i 6MT Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: SE USA iTrader: (0) Garage List 2019 BMW 440i [0.00] 2018 BMW 340i [0.00]	I think everyone is missing the main difference, c63 is automatic ONLY. That car is dead to me, i wouldn't take it for FREE If i wanted a fast straight line automatic, I would just get an SRT-8-whatever and for 2 grand a couple of redneck mechanics would make me a 600RWHP rocket. So, no thanks to c63
	Appreciate 0 Quote

05-07-2008, 09:27 AM	#17
stressdoc Moderator 618 Rep 10,858 Posts Drives: BMW i8; Toy 4runner TRD pro Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Waco TX iTrader: (0)	M3. Just wish we could get a CSL that weighed under 3k. Dream on. Or wait for the Z2. But then I would rather drive a Lotus than a tank. If you want a C63 why not get a 'vette? __________________ My recent ED photos: http://f80.bimmerpost.com/forums/sho....php?t=1026808 my not-so-recent ED: http://www.e90post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=31829 Please join BMWCCA http://bmwcca.org/index.php?pageid=c...&ref_by=300279
	Appreciate 0 Quote

05-07-2008, 10:14 AM	#18
BK Smiling politely 165 Rep 7,931 Posts Drives: 330i Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Washington DC iTrader: (0) Garage List 2006 330i [9.00]	Dammit, am I the only who can't find the link? __________________ E90 330i Black Sapphire 6MT \| 991.1 C4 Platinum Silver 7MT
	Appreciate 0 Quote

05-07-2008, 10:16 AM	#19
ttdmac Second Lieutenant 5 Rep 201 Posts Drives: E92 335i - Blk Saph/Coral Red Join Date: May 2005 Location: Indianapolis iTrader: (1)	The Stig says the M3 is faster around a track.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

05-07-2008, 01:36 PM	#22
KL2DC Moderator 318 Rep 17,767 Posts Drives: F36 428i,E90 328i, E85 Z4 3.0i Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: DC Metro iTrader: (23) Garage List 2015 F36 428i [0.00] 2011 E90 328i [0.00] 2006 E85 Z4 3.0i [0.00]	I find myself strangely attracted to the C63 as well despite all the published nods to the M3 dynamically and aesthetically and my general dislike/distrust of the 3-pointed star brand. __________________ Official DC Metro Registry - Current, New & Prospective Area Members Roll Call!
	Appreciate 0 Quote