View Single Post
      11-12-2007, 12:00 AM   #47
Joonsup
Lieutenant General
Joonsup's Avatar
South Korea
322
Rep
17,316
Posts

Drives: E92 M3, E30 325i
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bay Area

iTrader: (8)

Garage List
2008 BMW M3  [9.50]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgary Agent View Post
Joonsup -

Either of the cameras you're considering will give you years of enjoyment. Each is well engineered, but one consideration is which one feels better in your hands. Try each .... have the store put some glass on them and take some photos, paying particular attention to where the adjustment buttons / dials are on each.

I have the XTi .... but have no doubt the Nikon is pretty much a comparable body. That being said, these are higher quality upper end consumer SLR's ... they're not professional quality.

Most important is the GLASS and attachments (Flashes aka Speedlites). The built-in flashes work, but are next to hopeless for better quality shots. As far as the GLASS (lenses) go, if I were to buy either I'd purchase only the body and take the money you save and upgrade to a couple of quality lenses. The better the lens, the better the photos (well ... most often ). I'd stick with NIKON glass for Nikons and CANON glass for the Canon. I've spent almost $5K on glass and assorted accessories, and consider it a sound investment (these lenses will fit on the higher end professional bodies should you wish to upgrade)
Thanks for your advice Calgary. As i am a beginner I think the lens that the kit comes with will be sufficient enough for me until i learn more of how to become a better photographer. At first I wanted a camera to take pictures of my car, but I would like to be able to take pictures of other things as well ie people, nature, etc.. And i think by the time i become more sufficient in taking pictures, I'll be ready for different lenses.
Appreciate 0